Learn - Articles   -   Roastery   -   Quality Control / Cupping   -   Blog posts

Technically Speaking - Demystifying Roast Analysis!

Technically Speaking is the title of a recurring column that our very own product manager Chris Hallien is writing for Roast Magazine. In these columns, he tries to shed light on some technical aspects of coffee processing and evaluation. In the current March/April issue, he is talking about Colorimeters versus Spectrophotometers. Sounds interesting?

ROAST ANALYSIS IS A CRITICAL STEP in ensuring finished-product quality and consistency in the roasting process. For the majority of coffee roasters, roast analysis is performed by sensory evaluation - both visual and taste evaluation (cupping) executed at the individual roast batch level. Many roasters supplement sensory evaluations with one or more objective measurements. 

Regardless of the method of analysis, the most important components in evaluating quality are determining which measurements are critical to quality, deciding the most appropriate analysis to be performed and, importantly, identifying the variables that affect measurements.

A prototype of a leveling device designed for sample preparation, pictured with an Agtron sample dish. (Photo Credit: Chris Hallien)

Visual Evaluation

The prevailing method for roast analysis is visual evaluation (or inspection). As simple and intuitive as it may seem, there are a number of factors that impact this process. No standard best practices exist for visual inspection of roasted coffee. The field of sensory science provides guidance for performing visual evaluation and, while the entirety of recommendations may seem excessive or impractical, there are several factors relevant to roast analysis. Utilization of color standards, common in color inspection for other industries, is rarely employed in coffee evaluation. In coffee, color standards—also known as reference samples—are roasted coffee samples pulled from production and approved as color targets, which then serve as a visual reference for subsequent roast comparison. 

Best practices recommend the following: 

  • sample size of 3 inches by 5 inches (7.5 centimeters by 12.5 centimeters);
  • sample viewing geometry of either 0 degrees or 45 degrees; and
  • samples oriented side by side.

Head over to Roast to read the rest of the article!

Plus de nouvelles

Cafe   -   Blog posts

Bien commencer la journée avec la composition

La composition. La première tâche, et peut être la plus importante, dans la création d'un expresso délicieux respectant vos standards de qualité et que vos clients redemanderont. Il faut un ajustement…

En lire plus
Roastery   -   Quality Control / Cupping   -   Blog posts

Série Kaffee Panel - partie 1 : Philip Weller

Au début de l'année, nous avons invité quatre torréfacteurs expérimentés à un webinaire pour découvrir comment ils sont arrivés dans les premières place dans la compétition Kaffee Panel. À cet effet,…

En lire plus
Roastery   -   Blog posts

Série Kaffee Panel - partie 2 : Philip Weller

Carsten Wolters de Roestbar torréfie un café guatémaltèque lavé originaire de Finca Viczaya. Dans ce second article de notre série Kaffee Panel, nous présentons Carsten Wolters de Roestbar à Münster,…

En lire plus

Inscrivez-vous à notre newsletter

et découvrez les solutions pour

Here should be a form, apparently your browser blocks our forms.

Do you use an adblocker? If so, please try turning it off and reload this page.