Learn - Articles   -   Roastery   -   Quality Control / Cupping   -   Blog posts

Technically Speaking - Demystifying Roast Analysis!

Technically Speaking is the title of a recurring column that our very own product manager Chris Hallien is writing for Roast Magazine. In these columns, he tries to shed light on some technical aspects of coffee processing and evaluation. In the current March/April issue, he is talking about Colorimeters versus Spectrophotometers. Sounds interesting?

ROAST ANALYSIS IS A CRITICAL STEP in ensuring finished-product quality and consistency in the roasting process. For the majority of coffee roasters, roast analysis is performed by sensory evaluation - both visual and taste evaluation (cupping) executed at the individual roast batch level. Many roasters supplement sensory evaluations with one or more objective measurements. 

Regardless of the method of analysis, the most important components in evaluating quality are determining which measurements are critical to quality, deciding the most appropriate analysis to be performed and, importantly, identifying the variables that affect measurements.

A prototype of a leveling device designed for sample preparation, pictured with an Agtron sample dish. (Photo Credit: Chris Hallien)

Visual Evaluation

The prevailing method for roast analysis is visual evaluation (or inspection). As simple and intuitive as it may seem, there are a number of factors that impact this process. No standard best practices exist for visual inspection of roasted coffee. The field of sensory science provides guidance for performing visual evaluation and, while the entirety of recommendations may seem excessive or impractical, there are several factors relevant to roast analysis. Utilization of color standards, common in color inspection for other industries, is rarely employed in coffee evaluation. In coffee, color standards—also known as reference samples—are roasted coffee samples pulled from production and approved as color targets, which then serve as a visual reference for subsequent roast comparison. 

Best practices recommend the following: 

  • sample size of 3 inches by 5 inches (7.5 centimeters by 12.5 centimeters);
  • sample viewing geometry of either 0 degrees or 45 degrees; and
  • samples oriented side by side.

Head over to Roast to read the rest of the article!

その他のニュース

New releases

生豆カーブ予測で未来を見抜く

インテリジェント豆温度と人工知能(AI)に基づくRoR予測を特徴とするロースティング・インテリジェンス最新バージョンのリリースを当社はとても楽しみにしています。 これからはローストの進み具合を事前に把握!

 

続きを読みます
Roastery   -   Blog posts

あなたに最適な温度上昇率 (RoR) は?

温度上昇率に関する沢山の質問がクロップスターに寄せられています。 コーヒを愛する私たち技術者は温度上昇率に精通しています。 私たちのテクノロジーに関する専門知識はロースターの成長に繋がると確信しています。 彼にはコヒーに関する幅広い専門知識も欠かせません。 結果とし、私たちは世界的なリーディング コーヒー エキスパート達と連携をとりました:Anne Cooper、 Rob Hoos,、そして…

続きを読みます
New releases

ロースティングとAIで大事な事柄が:1ハゼ予測です

ロースティング インテリジェンス 4の最新のアップデートにより、クロップスターは人工知能(AI)に基づく1ハゼ予測を皆様にお届けします。1ハゼが発生する可能性が最も高いタイミングをを示し、それに応じて焙煎を計画できます。 全ての詳細をお読む。

続きを読みます

ニュースレターを読む

以下のソリューションの詳細をみる

Here should be a form, apparently your browser blocks our forms.

Do you use an adblocker? If so, please try turning it off and reload this page.